A Palestinian State? Interpreting Netanyahu’s Speech

A Palestinian State? Interpreting Netanyahu’s Speech

Feature Writer. By Feature Writer Jonathan Mok
This article was authored by a GlobalComment Feature Writer. To contribute an article, please see the guidelines here.

Professor Nigel Ashton, who recently spoke to Jonathan Mok about the life and legacy of King Hussein, returns to answer questions about Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent speech and what it means for the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Jonathan Mok: How should the Netanyahu speech be interpreted?

Nigel Ashton: Beyond uttering the words ‘Palestinian state’ Netanyahu has not yet conceded the creation of an entity which would have genuine sovereignty. His concept of ‘demilitarisation’ is so wide ranging that any Palestinian state created under it could not be deemed to have full control over its territory and would therefore not be sovereign. Nevertheless, he has at least conceded that peace negotiations cannot proceed on the basis of his opening position which amounted to little more than a form of economic autonomy. So there has at least been some movement in his position even if so far this is limited.

JM: It appears that the Arab world has been silent in response to Bibi’s speech. How do you perceive the apparent lack of interest?

Continue Reading »

“When the King pressed hard for a broader peace settlement, his approach did not find a receptive audience in the region.”

“I told them right away, I wouldn’t have any seductive, veiled women on the cover!”

recent contributions